RUA TOPIC- Ethics of Euthanasia PICO: P:In terminally ill adult patients I: what are the ethical implications of physician-assisted Euthanasia C: Comparing Euthanasia to palliative care O: In terms of

RUA TOPIC- Ethics of Euthanasia PICO: P:In terminally ill adult patients I: what are the ethical implications of physician-assisted Euthanasia C: Comparing Euthanasia to palliative care O: In terms of
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Topic Search Strategy Guidelines TOPIC ASSIGNED TO GROUP BY INSTRUCTOR­- Ethics of Euthanasia Group formed PICO-. P: In terminally ill adult patients I: what are the ethical implications of physician-assisted Euthanasia. C: Comparing euthanasia to palliative care O: In terms of patient autonomy and societal perception Group formed -RESEARCH QUESTION “In terminally ill adult patients, what are the ethical implications of physician- assisted euthanasia compared to palliative care in terms of patient autonomy, relief of suffering and impact on families and healthcare providers?” Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment. Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present Clinical Question (45 points/28%) 45 points 40 points 37 points 33 points 0 points Required criteria Describe the problem. What is the focus of your group’s work? Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations. PICOT question in support of the group topic. State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is similar to a problem statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .” Includes 4 requirements. Includes 3 requirements. Includes 2 requirements. Includes 1 requirement. No requirements for this section presented. Levels of Evidence (20 points/13%) 20 points 16 points 10 points 0 points Required criteria Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.). What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)? Includes 2 requirements. Includes 1 requirement. Incomplete or inaccurate information presented. No requirements for this section presented. Search Strategy (65 points/41%) 65 points 58 points 54 points 48 points 0 points Required criteria List search terms and results. Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above. Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what? Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years). Includes 4 requirements. Includes 3 requirements. Includes 2 requirements. Includes 1 requirement. No requirements for this section presented. Organization and APA Style (30 points/18%) 30 points 27 points 25 points 15 points 0 points Required criteria Correct grammar and spelling. Include a title page. Use of headings for each section. Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines. 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages. Includes 6 requirements. Includes 5 requirements. Includes 3-4 requirements. Includes 1-2 requirements. No requirements for this section presented. Total Points Possible = 160 points © 2021 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved NR449_RUA_Topic_Search_Strategy_V2_JUL22 0