SUPERIOR-PAPERS.COM essay writing company is the ideal place for homework help. If you are looking for affordable, custom-written, high-quality and non-plagiarized papers, your student life just became easier with us. Click the button below to place your order.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
- Read Beyond GDP: It’s time for the national accounts to put people first. (Links to an external site.)
Respond to the following questions:
- Why does Stiglitz believe that measuring a nation’s well-being should go beyond GDP?
- What specific policies and societal norms highlight our nation’s emphasis on the factors of production and/or consumption?
- What steps can be taken at the local and national levels to put greater emphasis on outcomes, like health, education, and the environment?
- What does scripture have to say about this topic? Find at least one biblical verse to support your comments.
- This discussion should be 250 words or more. I attached the article “Beyond GDP” to this question.
Read Beyond GDP: It’s time for the national accounts to put people first. (Links to an external site.)Respond to the following questions:Why does Stiglitz believe that measuring a nation’s well-being
28 • Corporate Knights • Winter 2019 Joseph E. Stiglitz is the winner of the 2001 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. His most recent book is Globalization and its Discontents Revisited: Anti-Globalization in the Era of Trump. Ten years ago, he was one of the authors of the International Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress report: Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up I NCHEON – Just under ten years ago, the International Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress issued its report, Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up. The title summed it up: GDP is not a good measure of wellbeing. What we measure affects what we do, and if we measure the wrong thing, we will do the wrong thing. If we focus only on material wellbeing – on, say, the production of goods, rather than on health, education, and the environment – we become distorted in the same way that these measures are distorted; we become more materialistic. We were more than pleased with the recep – tion of our report, which spurred an interna – tional movement of academics, civil society, and governments to construct and employ metrics that reflected a broader conception of wellbeing. The OECD has constructed a Better Life Index, containing a range of metrics that better reflect what constitutes and leads to wellbeing. It also supported a successor to the Commission, the High Level Expert Group on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. At the OECD’s sixth World Forum on Statistics, Knowledge, and Policy in Incheon, South Korea this past November, the Group issued its report, Beyond GDP: Measuring What Counts for Economic and Social Performance. The new report highlights several topics, like trust and insecurity, which had been only briefly addressed by Mismeasuring Our Lives, and explores several others, like inequality and sustainability, more deeply. And it explains how inadequate metrics have led to deficient policies in many areas. Better indicators would have revealed the highly negative and possi – bly long-lasting effects of the deep post-2008 downturn on productivity and wellbeing, in which case policymakers might not have been so enamored of austerity, which lowered fiscal deficits, but reduced national wealth, properly measured, even more. Political outcomes in the United States and many other countries in recent years have re – flected the state of insecurity in which many ordinary citizens live, and to which GDP pays Beyond GDP It’s time for the national accounts to put people first BY Joseph s tigLitz Illustration by CK Statistics wHaT ma TTers Winter 2019 • Corporate Knights • 29 scant attention. A range of policies focused nar – rowly on GDP and fiscal prudence has fueled this insecurity. Consider the effects of pension “reforms” that force individuals to bear more risk, or of labor-market “reforms” that, in the name of boosting “flexibility,” weaken work – ers’ bargaining position by giving employers more freedom to fire them, leading in turn to lower wages and more insecurity. Better met – rics would, at the minimum, weigh these costs against the benefits, possibly compelling poli – cymakers to accompany such changes with oth – ers that enhance security and equality. Spurred on by Scotland, a small group of countries has now formed the Wellbeing Economy Alliance. The hope is that govern – ments putting wellbeing at the center of their agenda will redirect their budgets accordingly. For example, a New Zealand government fo – cused on wellbeing would direct more of its attention and resources to childhood poverty. Better metrics would also become an im – portant diagnostic tool, helping countries both identify problems before matters spiral out of control and select the right tools to address them. Had the US, for example, focused more on health, rather than just on GDP, the decline in life expectancy among those without a col – lege education, and especially among those in America’s deindustrialized regions, would have been apparent years ago. Likewise, metrics of equality of opportu – nity have only recently exposed the hypocrisy of America’s claim to be a land of opportunity: Yes, anyone can get ahead, so long as they are born of rich, white parents. The data reveal that the US is riddled with so-called inequality traps: Those born at the bottom are likely to remain there. If we are to eliminate these in – equality traps, we first have to know that they exist, and then ascertain what creates and sus – tains them. A little more than a quarter-century ago, US President Bill Clinton ran on a platform of “putting people first.” It is remarkable how difficult it is to do that, even in a democracy. Corporate and other special interests always seek to ensure that their interests come first. The massive US tax cut enacted by the Trump administration in December 2017 is an ex – ample, par excellence. Ordinary people – the dwindling but still vast middle class – must bear a tax increase, and millions will lose health insurance, in order to finance a tax cut for bil – lionaires and corporations. If we want to put people first, we have to know what matters to them, what improves their wellbeing, and how we can supply more of whatever that is. The Beyond GDP measurement agenda will continue to play a critical role in helping us achieve these crucial goals. K “If we want to put people first, we have to know what matters to them, what improves their wellbeing, and how we can supply more of whatever that is. The Beyond GDP measurement agenda will continue to play a critical role in helping us achieve these crucial goals.” — JOSEPH STIGLITZ Advertis ement Subscribe to CK’s digital edition and purchase back issues or an annual subscription. Visit corporateknights.com or Apple’s app store. Easy. Convenient. Interactive. Sustainable. Copyright ofCorporate KnightsMagazine isthe property ofCorporate KnightsInc.andits content maynotbecopied oremailed tomultiple sitesorposted toalistserv without the copyright holder’sexpresswrittenpermission. However,usersmayprint, download, oremail articles forindividual use.