Patagonia – A designer of outdoor clothing and gear.
Watch this YouTube Video and then do an Internet search for information to answer the following questions:
1: How does the mission of Patagonia differ from most other companies?
2: Patagonia has often been selected as one of the country’s best places to work. What Patagonia HR practices and employee benefits do you think help Patagonia earn this honor?
3: What characteristics would you use to describe a candidate likely to be hired by Patagonia? How do these characteristics reflect and support Patagonia’s strategy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQelqPqiGLo&feature=emb_logo
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Writing and Proofreading
|
| 2.5 pts
Written responses are free of grammatical spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication.
|
2.0 pts
Written responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally facilitates communication.
|
1.5 pts
Written responses contain a few errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation, etc. Some errors but not so many to indicate repetitive distractions.
|
1.0 pts
Written responses include some grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The errors distract the reader.
|
0.5 pts
Uses incorrect grammar and incorrect sentence structure consistently. The errors interfere with the communication process.
|
|
2.5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehension of material
|
| 3.0 pts
The writer understands significant ideas relevant to the issue under discussion. This is indicated by correct use of terminology, precise selection of information components required to make a point. Correct use of examples .
|
2.4 pts
Able to distinguish and comprehends a deeper meaning on most occasions. Ideas are reasonably clear. Some subjective evaluation is necessary to determine what the writer means.
|
1.8 pts
Comprehends the surface level meaning of the material and begins to relate issues to general knowledge and experience
|
1.2 pts
Demonstrates some basic comprehension of the material . Does not make connections with the bigger picture.
|
0.6 pts
Not comprehending or reflecting on what is read or viewed
|
|
3.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength, content and ability to interpret and answer assignment
|
| 1.5 pts
Work demonstrates that all tasks were completed Showed some originality and extra initiative in completing assignment.
|
1.2 pts
Work demonstrates that significant effort was made to attempt all aspects of the assignment. Ideas connected clearly.
|
0.9 pts
Work demonstrates that some effort was made to attempt all tasks that were assigned. Occasional sense of engagement of writer with the subject matter.
|
0.6 pts
Little effort was made to attempt all tasks that were assigned. Ideas were connected but weak
|
0.3 pts
Very little effort was given to the task assignment. No response was given.
|
|
1.5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance of answers, opinions and ideas.
|
| 3.0 pts
Student is clearly expressing arguments, opinions and responses in answering assignments. Superior ideas and insights. Answers are clear and complex.
|
2.4 pts
Student is more consistent in expressing arguments, opinions and responses when answering assignments
|
1.8 pts
Student is learning to develop and express arguments, opinions and responses in answering assignments. More complex and insightful answers.
|
1.2 pts
Not developing their ability to express arguments, ideas or opinions. Ideas are not complex or insightful. May include some information that distracts from central purpose.
|
0.6 pts
Student is not able to express opinions, ideas, and responses due to inadequate writing skills. Ideas are unclear.
|
|
3.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 10.0
|
