FOUNDATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE As a psychiatric and mental health nurse practitioner, it is essential for you to have a strong background in foundational neuroscience. In order to diagnose and treat patien

FOUNDATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE As a psychiatric and mental health nurse practitioner, it is essential for you to have a strong background in foundational neuroscience. In order to diagnose and treat patien
URS_6630_Week2_Discussion_Rubric NURS_6630_Week2_Discussion_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. 44 to >39.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s)…. Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources…. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth…. Supported by at least three current credible sources. 39 to >34.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Responds to most of the Discussion question(s)…. Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth…. Supported by at least three credible references. 34 to >30.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Responds to some of the Discussion question(s)…. One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed…. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis…. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. Post is cited with fewer than two credible references. 30 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Does not respond to the Discussion question(s)…. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria…. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis…. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. Contains only one or no credible references. 44 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Writing 6 to >5.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Written clearly and concisely…. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors…. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 5 to >4.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Written concisely…. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors…. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 4 to >3.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Written somewhat concisely…. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors…. Contains some APA formatting errors. 3 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Not written clearly or concisely…. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors…. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. 6 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting:Timely and full participation 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts main Discussion by due date. 8 to >7.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Posts main Discussion by due date…. Meets requirements for full participation. 7 to >6.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Posts main Discussion by due date. 6 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post main Discussion by due date. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. 9 to >8.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responds to questions posed by faculty…. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. 8 to >7.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. 7 to >6.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Response is on topic, may have some depth. 6 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Response may not be on topic, lacks depth. 9 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:Writing 6 to >5.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed…. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources…. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English. 5 to >4.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed…. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources…. Response is written in Standard, Edited English. 4 to >3.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed…. Few or no credible sources are cited. 3 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication…. Response to faculty questions are missing…. No credible sources are cited. 6 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response:Timely and full participation 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts by due date. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Meets requirements for full participation…. Posts by due date. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Posts by due date. 2 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post by due date. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. 9 to >8.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responds to questions posed by faculty…. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. 8 to >7.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. 7 to >6.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Response is on topic, may have some depth. 6 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Response may not be on topic, lacks depth. 9 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:Writing 6 to >5.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed…. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources…. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English. 5 to >4.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed…. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources…. Response is written in Standard, Edited English. 4 to >3.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed…. Few or no credible sources are cited. 3 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication…. Response to faculty questions are missing…. No credible sources are cited. 6 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response:Timely and full participation 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts by due date. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Meets requirements for full participation…. Posts by due date. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Posts by due date. 2 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post by due date. 5 pts Total Points: 100